从 FingBugs的错误来看JAVA代码质量(四)

xiaoxiao2021-02-28  77

错误码:RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_OF_NONNULL_VALUE   Bug: Redundant nullcheck of bean1, which is known to be non-null Pattern id: RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_OF_NONNULL_VALUE, type: RCN, category: STYLE This method contains a redundant check of a known non-null value against the constant null. 解释:这种方法包含了一个称为非空对空值的不断重复检查。 修改为: 错误码:SS_SHOULD_BE_STATIC Bug: Unread field: ADDRESS_KEY; should this field be static? Pattern id: SS_SHOULD_BE_STATIC, type: SS, category: PERFORMANCE This class contains an instance final field that is initialized to a compile-time static value. Consider making the field static. 解释: final成员变量表示常量,只能被赋值一次,赋值后值不再改变。 这个类包含的一个final变量初始化为编译时静态值。考虑变成静态常量 解决方法: 增加static关键字 错误码:NM_METHOD_NAMING_CONVENTION Bug: The method name MsmPlanDAOTest.TestViewMsmPlanList() doesn't start with a lower case letter Pattern id: NM_METHOD_NAMING_CONVENTION, type: Nm, category: BAD_PRACTICE Methods should be verbs, in mixed case with the first letter lowercase, with the first letter of each internal word capitalized. 解释: 方法应该是动词,与第一个字母小写混合的情况下,与每个单词的首字母大写的内部。 解决方法: 方法名称小写就通过了。我们写代码还是要规范啊,虽然是单元测试的代码!
转载请注明原文地址: https://www.6miu.com/read-68304.html

最新回复(0)